Four Treasures Reference Database
Record No. 16974

Emerald deposits: A review and enhanced classification

Journal Article
Giuliani, G., Groat, L., Marshall, D., Fallick, A.E. and Branquet, Y. (2019) Emerald deposits: A review and enhanced classification. Minerals, Vol. 9, No. 2: 105, February, 63 pp..
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/min9020105  |  Sinkankas/Born No.: NIS/NIB  |  RWHL*
Close Abstract Hide Keywords Copy Reference
gems, beryl, emerald, Colombia, Afghanistan, Brazil, Russia, Mozambique, Madagascar, Zambia, Zimbabwe, India, geology, analytical, provenance, emerald worldwide
Although emerald deposits are relatively rare, they form in specific yet varied geological settings, and current classification models are often too restrictive, leading to confusion about the precise formation mechanisms of certain occurrences; emerald is essentially beryl containing sufficient concentrations of chromium and vanadium to produce its characteristic green hues, and its formation depends on conditions supplying both beryllium and chromium or vanadium—traditionally grouped into three types: desilicated pegmatite-related deposits formed by metasomatic fluid interaction with beryllium-rich pegmatites intruding Cr- or V-rich rocks; sedimentary deposits, responsible for much gem-quality emerald, formed by brine interaction with Cr/V-bearing sedimentary rocks along faults; and the rarer metamorphic-metasomatic deposits involving deep crustal fluids and metamorphosed shales, carbonates, and ultramafic rocks—with all three models requiring tectonic activity, which can transform one type into another through metamorphism and partial melting, thus blurring distinctions; to address the limitations, this paper proposes an enhanced classification system based on geological environment (magmatic or metamorphic), host-rock type, metamorphic grade, mineralization style, and fluid characteristics, accounting for multi-stage processes, beryllium remobilization, and using chemical, isotopic, and fluid inclusion studies to support genetic models, thereby categorizing emeralds into two main types: Type I (tectonic magmatic-related) with sub-types in (IA) mafic-ultramafic rocks (e.g. Brazil, Zambia, Russia), (IB) sedimentary rocks (e.g. China, Canada, Norway), and (IC) granitic rocks (e.g. Nigeria); and Type II (tectonic metamorphic-related) with sub-types in (IIA) mafic-ultramafic rocks (e.g. Brazil, Austria), (IIB) sedimentary rocks (e.g. Colombia, Canada, USA), (IIC) metamorphic rocks (e.g. China, Afghanistan, USA), and (IID) metamorphosed and remobilized or hidden intrusion-related deposits (e.g. Austria, Egypt, Australia, Pakistan), plus some unclassified occurrences.