Four Treasures Reference Database
Record No. 2051
Application of phase contrast microscopy in gemmology
Journal Article
Gübelin, E.J. (1957) Application of phase contrast microscopy in gemmology. Journal of Gemmology, Vol. 6, No. 4, October, pp. 151–165.
ISBN/ISSN: 221252 | Sinkankas/Born No.: NIS/NIB | RWHL
inclusions, microscopy, gems
Gübelin introduces phase contrast microscopy as a means of improving the visibility of inclusions and structural irregularities within gemstones, explaining its optical principles and the modifications required for gemmological use. The method increases brightness differences between transparent features and their surroundings, allowing details that are indistinct under conventional illumination to become more readily observable. He first considers the limitations of bright-field and dark-field examination. Closing the condenser diaphragm can increase contrast in bright-field illumination, but reduces resolving power, darkens the image, and introduces diffraction effects that may complicate interpretation. Dark-field illumination makes inclusions conspicuous against a dark background, yet may emphasize their boundaries while obscuring subtler internal details. To explain the alternative offered by phase contrast, Gübelin outlines Abbe’s account of microscopic image formation through diffraction and interference, stressing that magnification alone cannot reveal progressively finer structures. He distinguishes amplitude objects, whose visibility depends principally on differences in light absorption, from phase objects, whose transparent structures chiefly alter the phase of transmitted light. Although most actual specimens combine both effects, this distinction explains why transparent inclusions can remain difficult to see even when they differ optically from the surrounding gemstone. Following Zernike’s principle, a phase plate positioned in the objective’s back focal plane shifts the direct light relative to the diffracted light by approximately one-quarter wavelength. Their subsequent interference converts otherwise imperceptible phase differences into visible intensity differences, producing stronger contrast. Gübelin then addresses the practical difficulty of applying conventional phase contrast equipment to gemstones: objectives designed for high magnification and thin preparations cannot readily examine inclusions situated deep within a substantial stone. He describes equipment developed by Zeiss-Winkel, with the assistance of H. Piller, to meet this requirement. Its components include an adjustable collecting lens, three special achromatic objectives incorporating annular phase plates and providing long working distances, and alternative condensers fitted with appropriate phase annuli. The objectives also permit bright-field and dark-field observation, facilitating direct comparison of the same feature under different illumination conditions. In the supplied opening portion of the article, the emphasis is therefore on the physical basis and instrumental adaptation of the technique, presenting phase contrast as a complementary tool for detailed examination and research into gemstone interiors.
